Skip to main content

Mecca hotels · head to head

Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah vs Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel

Two Mecca hotels from the same ingest sample — 5-star Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah against 5-star Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel — compared on dated guest scores, not inventing rates or walks.

  • Both 5-star
  • 5 points compared
  • Guest sentiment from our hotel data provider
  • No sponsored placements

By Kaiser Khan · last reviewed

Check either one

Rates for both move constantly, so nothing here quotes a price. Each full review carries the rate comparison for that property.

Ad · Trip.comBrowse all Mecca hotelsNeither property is pre-selected — this opens the partner's whole city list.

Why these two, and not any two

Both appear in the same Mecca shortlist with enough review volume to compare headlines, cleanliness and location categories honestly.

We publish a handful of comparisons per city, chosen by an editor. We do not generate a page for every possible pairing: at thirty hotels that would be 435 near-identical pages per city, and at five hundred it would be 124,750 for one city alone — which is a doorway-page pattern, not a service to anybody trying to pick a hotel.

Should you book this hotel?

Which one to book

Take Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah if the higher headline (8.9 from 20,000) is the decision; take Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel only if its pin, star band or amenity list fits a different itinerary — both still need the named cons read aloud.

Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah posts 8.9 from 20,000 as of 9 January 2026; Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel posts 8.4 from 20,000 as of 7 January 2026. Larger samples are more trustworthy when headlines are close.

Cleanliness: Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah 8.04; Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel 7.73. Location: Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah 9.55; Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel 8.74.

POI coverage: Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah has 9 rows; Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel has 8 rows. We do not invent distances where rows are missing.

Neither page quotes a nightly rate — check partner links for your dates, then the hotel’s own site.

Best for

  • Choosing between Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah and Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel on guest data
  • Travellers who will read cleanliness scores before star badges

Not for

  • Readers looking for a cheaper third option — this page is a pair only
  • Anyone who has already decided on one pin for non-negotiable reasons

Verdict last reviewed . Rates, refurbishments and management change — re-check anything time-sensitive before booking.

The two properties

Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah — supplier photograph 1

Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah

5-star hotelJabal Omar / Haram edgeHyatt Regency

A 5-star Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah at Jabal Omar, Ibrahim Al Khalil Road — Masjid al-Haram (The Grand Mosque) & the Kaaba at 0.2 km with a 8.9 headline from 20,000 reviews and cleanliness issues named in the cons.

Third-party guest reviews: 8.9/10 from 20,000 reviews — as of

Praised consistently
Great service · Convenient location · Good food quality
Complained about consistently
Cleanliness issues · Room quality concerns

Read the full Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah review

Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel — supplier photograph 1

Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel

5-star hotelClock Tower / Abraj Al-BaitAccor

A 5-star Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel at King Abdul Aziz Endownment, Abraj Al Bait Complex PO Box 762, Makkah, 21955 — Masjid al-Haram (Great Mosque of Mecca) at 0.1 km with a 8.4 headline from 20,000 reviews and high price named in the cons.

Third-party guest reviews: 8.4/10 from 20,000 reviews — as of

Praised consistently
Excellent service · Great location · Friendly staff · Comfortable rooms · Outstanding cleanliness
Complained about consistently
High price · Inconsistent cleaning · Parking fees · Room view issues

Read the full Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel review

Point by point

Every row is checkable against the supplier data on the two property pages. “Level” is a real answer and is used — a comparison where one side wins every row is usually a comparison somebody wrote backwards from the conclusion.

Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah compared with Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel, point by point
What is being comparedJabal Omar Hyatt Regency MakkahMakkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont HotelEdge
Official classification5-star5-starLevel
Supplier guest headline8.9 /10 from 20,0008.4 /10 from 20,000Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah
Cleanliness category8.04/107.73/10Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah
Location category9.55/108.74/10Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah
POI rows in this seed9 landmarks8 landmarksJabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah

Rows taken: Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah 4, Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel 0, level 1. Counting rows is not how you pick a hotel — one row usually decides it, and the verdict above says which.

Neither of these?

  • Where to stay in Mecca

    Every property we cover in Mecca, the areas they sit in, and the verdict on which area suits which trip.

  • Read the full Mecca guide

    Neighbourhoods, transport, costs and seasons — then use Popular searches for the city guide and these four hotel shortlists.

Common questions

Which has the stronger guest headline?
Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah at 8.9 from 20,000 versus Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel at 8.4 from 20,000. We have not stayed — this is a desk assessment from our hotel data provider’s dated guest analysis on the page.
Should I decide on star class alone?
No — Jabal Omar Hyatt Regency Makkah is 5-star and Makkah Clock Royal Tower, A Fairmont Hotel is 5-star, but cleanliness and named cons matter more than the badge. Read both hotel pages.