Hotellook shut down on 20 October 2025 and its site no longer resolves. Which hotel metasearch to use instead, and how to rebuild your booking routine.

Key takeaways

Is Hotellook still working in 2026?

Link to this answer

No. Hotellook shut down on 20 October 2025. The site no longer resolves in a browser and its developer endpoint returns a 404, so there is nothing left to search or book. Use Trivago, Kayak or Google Hotels as your radar instead, then finish on an OTA such as Booking.com or Agoda.

This page used to be a three-way metasearch comparison. It is now a switching guide, because one of the three no longer exists. Hotellook was the hotel metasearch that ran alongside Aviasales; when it closed, the consumer site and the hotel data API behind it went together.

We re-checked on 6 August 2026 and nothing has changed: hotellook.com does not resolve at all — the connection fails outright, rather than serving a maintenance page — and engine.hotellook.com, the host its API and embedded widgets called, answers 404.

If you arrived from a bookmark, an old blog post or a “compare it on Hotellook” instruction, jump to what Hotellook users should do now. If you only want the shortest working answer: pick one metasearch, open two merchants, compare the all-in total, and book the one whose cancellation terms you can live with.

For the merchant-level fight that happens after the meta click, read Booking.com vs Agoda vs Hotels.com, and start wider shopping at hotel deals.

Honest disclosure: Booking.com and Agoda are TravelShifu partners. Trivago, Kayak and Google Hotels are editorial — we earn nothing from them, which is also why we can be blunt about where each one is weak.

  • Hotellook closed on 20 October 2025
  • hotellook.com does not resolve; engine.hotellook.com returns 404
  • No successor site, no redirect, no archived search
  • Closest like-for-like replacement: Trivago
  • Finish on a merchant, not on a meta tile

What happened to Hotellook, and is the API gone too?

Link to this answer

Hotellook closed on 20 October 2025 and both halves went with it: the consumer metasearch at hotellook.com and the hotel data API that publishers and price widgets ran on. There is no successor domain and no redirect. Any site still showing a Hotellook search box is displaying a dead embed.

We do not have an official post-mortem to quote, so we will describe only what can be observed from outside. As of our 6 August 2026 re-check, hotellook.com fails to resolve, and engine.hotellook.com — the endpoint the API and the affiliate widgets called — returns 404. That is closure, not an outage.

Practically, that means three things. Old Hotellook deep links are dead. Hotellook price widgets embedded in other travel sites now render empty or fail silently. And any hotel price attributed to Hotellook in an article written in 2025 or earlier is unverifiable today, because there is no longer a source to check it against.

If you booked through a Hotellook handoff before it closed, your reservation was never held by Hotellook. Metasearch passes you to a merchant and steps out of the transaction, so the booking lives with whichever OTA or hotel took the payment. Find that confirmation email and manage the stay there.

TravelShifu removed Hotellook from its partner list rather than leaving a card that looks live. We kept this page because “is Hotellook still working” is a question people are genuinely still typing, and the honest answer deserves a page of its own rather than a silent redirect into a generic hotel hub.

  • Closed 20 October 2025 — consumer site and API together
  • DNS failure on the main domain; 404 on the API host
  • Old deep links and embedded widgets are dead
  • Pre-closure bookings sit with the merchant, not with Hotellook
  • Prices quoted from Hotellook in older articles cannot be verified

Which hotel metasearch should you use instead of Hotellook?

Link to this answer

Trivago is the closest like-for-like replacement — hotel-only, wide OTA coverage, no flight clutter. Kayak suits you if your flight alerts already live there. Google Hotels is the fastest phone check and has the best map. All three hand you to a merchant, and we earn nothing from any of them.

None of these is a drop-in clone, so pick on bias rather than on brand. Hotellook was a thin, fast price radar that scanned OTAs and got out of the way; each live option adds something you may or may not want. Sponsored placements exist on all of them — sort by price carefully and still open the property page.

Trivago is the closest in spirit: hotels only, no bundles, a wide spread of OTAs behind each tile. Kayak is strong in major markets, thins out in secondary cities and will keep nudging you toward flight+hotel packages. Google Hotels is the quickest thing to reach from a phone and has the best map by a distance, but its merchant list per property is shallower and independents are patchier.

None of the three is a TravelShifu partner. We earn nothing whichever radar you open, which is exactly why we can say Kayak is weak outside big cities and Google Hotels shows you fewer merchants than it looks like it does. The money on this page comes from Booking.com and Agoda, at the merchant step, and it is labelled where it happens.

Tile photos lie when hotels keep serving shots of rooms they have since renovated — or never renovated. Once a radar has shortlisted two properties, open recent guest photos on the OTA rather than the gallery the hotel supplied. Street-level walkability matters more than a 0.2 score difference.

Filter discipline: set max distance to the landmark you will actually visit, not the geographic centroid of the city. ‘Centre’ means different things in London, Istanbul and Bangkok.

Sort by price after filtering stars and review score floors. Sorting by price first trains you to consider properties you will reject on location — wasted attention. Remember the tile price is not the bill either: read what is a resort fee before you decide a radar has found you a winner.

Cars and tours are separate decisions — see DiscoverCars vs Rentalcars vs Economybookings and GetYourGuide vs Viator vs Klook.

Which hotel metasearch should you use instead of Hotellook?
Which hotel metasearch should you use instead of Hotellook?
Dimension (Hotellook closed 20 Oct 2025 — not listed)Trivago (editorial)Kayak (editorial)Google Hotels (editorial)
Primary jobHotel-only price comparisonWhole-trip meta with hotelsFast hotel lookup in search and maps
Closest to the old Hotellook habitYes — nearest like-for-likePartlyPartly
Flight toolkit overlapLimitedStrongSeparate (Google Flights)
OTA handoffWideWideNarrower — fewer merchants per tile
Map / filter feelHotel-centric UX, decent filtersIntegrated travel UXBest map, thinnest filters
Package riskHotels-firstWatch flight+hotel bundlesHotels-first
Secondary-city coverageGoodPatchyFine in cities, weak on independents
Best paired withBooking.com / Agoda dual-quoteA flight already ticketed elsewhereA two-minute phone check before you commit
Commercial status on this pageEditorial — no relationshipEditorial — no relationshipEditorial — no relationship

What happens after you click through to an OTA?

Link to this answer

You leave metasearch rules and enter the OTA or hotel merchant’s cancellation, payment and member-price world. Re-check the room name, deposit and free-cancellation deadline. If Booking.com or Agoda wins, still glance at the hotel official site before paying.

Logged-in Genius or VIP prices may not match the radar tile. That is normal. Run the logged-out-versus-logged-in check set out in Booking.com vs Agoda vs Hotels.com, which is where that habit is explained properly.

Message translations on OTA chat are imperfect for access instructions. If you need step-free access, confirm with the hotel directly and get the answer in writing. Meta tiles will not know about the temporary lift outage.

Loyalty login on hotel sites can reveal member rates metas never show. Take the extra two minutes. Status matching promotions sometimes require direct booking too.

Currency toggles on metasearch can reshuffle winners because merchants quote differently by display currency. Keep the display currency aligned with your card’s billing currency when comparing, then ignore tiny gaps inside FX noise. A 1% tile difference is not a reason to reopen the entire evening.

Save the merchant confirmation, not the radar tile. Hotellook closing is the argument for this: readers who had saved searches and wishlists inside it lost the lot overnight, while anyone holding a Booking.com or Agoda confirmation email kept their stay untouched. Keep the record where the booking actually lives.

Once you have booked — say Trivago pointed you at Booking.com and the total held up at checkout — resist the urge to keep hunting for days. Cancellation windows exist for true plan changes, not for compulsive re-optimisation. Put the energy into neighbourhood research and restaurant planning instead.

Neighbourhood research means walking-time checks to the stations, museums and dinner streets you will actually use. A hotel that wins metasearch on price but adds a £15 daily ride-hail habit is not the winner. Open the map, measure the walks, then complete checkout on the merchant with clear cancellation text.

If Kayak’s hotel list looks thin in a secondary city, that is normal — fall back to Trivago or Google Hotels rather than forcing a package. Metasearch coverage is uneven at the edges of tourism, and it got more uneven when Hotellook closed and took one of the radars out of circulation. In a small town the answer is often to skip the radars entirely and price the three or four properties that exist directly.

You used Hotellook — what should you do now?

Link to this answer

Put Trivago in the slot Hotellook used to fill, and keep Kayak or Google Hotels as a second opinion. The rest of your routine is unchanged: radar, two merchants, book. Anything you booked before 20 October 2025 sits with the merchant that charged you, not with Hotellook.

The switch is smaller than it feels. Hotellook was one step in a routine, not the routine itself — it scanned OTAs and handed you off. Drop Trivago into that step and everything downstream is identical: shortlist two properties, price each on two merchants plus the hotel’s own site, then book the best price–terms pair. Nobody needs to learn a new way of shopping for hotels here.

Old bookings first, because that is the anxious question. Metasearch never held your reservation. If you clicked out of Hotellook and paid Booking.com, Agoda, Expedia or the hotel itself, that merchant holds the booking and that merchant is who changes or refunds it. Search your inbox for the confirmation from them rather than for anything with Hotellook in the subject line, and manage the stay in their account as normal.

Bookmarks and saved searches are gone for good. There is no export, no archive and no successor site to move them into — hotellook.com does not resolve, so even the old URLs are unreachable rather than merely empty. Rebuild your shortlist by hand once. It takes a few minutes and it is the last time you will have to do it.

If you run a website, the cleanup is bigger. Any Hotellook search box, price widget or deep link you embedded is now calling a host that answers 404, so it renders empty or fails silently while your readers assume it is working. Pull those out rather than leaving a dead form on the page, and re-point the affiliate links you actually earn from. TravelShifu did the same: the Hotellook partner card is gone from the site, and nothing here links to it any more.

What we cannot tell you is why it closed. There is no official post-mortem to quote, no statement to point at and no successor product to explain it. Anyone giving you a confident reason is guessing, and we would rather write ‘we do not know’ than invent a story around a dead domain. What we can verify is the state of the domains, which we re-checked on 6 August 2026.

For the merchant-level fight that starts the moment you leave a radar, go back to Booking.com vs Agoda vs Hotels.com.

  • Default radar → Trivago; second opinion → Kayak or Google Hotels
  • Pre-closure bookings live with the merchant that took the payment
  • Old links, widgets and bookmarks are unrecoverable — delete them
  • Partner links here are Booking.com and Agoda; the radars are editorial
  • Why it closed — no statement, no post-mortem, no honest answer available

What is the fifteen-minute hotel metasearch method?

Link to this answer

Minutes 0–5: run the same search on Trivago and on one of Kayak or Google Hotels. Minutes 5–10: open the best two merchants for your top property, plus the hotel’s own site. Minutes 10–15: book the winner on terms, screenshot it, stop. Longer sessions mostly buy fatigue errors.

Fatigue errors include booking the wrong dates, the wrong city airport hotel, or a non-refundable rate while your flight is still hold-status. A timer is not a gimmick; it is risk control.

If Trivago points at Booking.com and Kayak points at Agoda for the same room, open both and apply the merchant-level checks in Booking.com vs Agoda vs Hotels.com. Radar disagreement is a feature — it tells you to verify.

Kayak users should still run a hotel-only pass when the flight is already ticketed elsewhere. Bundles are optional, not mandatory. Mixing a great hotel with a poor basic-economy flight is a separate set of trade-offs from metasearch quality.

After booking, add the cancellation deadline to your calendar with a 48-hour alert. That single habit outperforms most ‘secret booking hacks’ content on the internet. Then move on to tours, transport and insurance with a clear head.

  • Timer for fifteen minutes
  • Two radars → two merchants → hotel site
  • Calendar the cancellation deadline
  • Do not bundle by default
  • Stop shopping after confirmation

Which metasearch filters improve hotel shortlists fastest?

Link to this answer

Filter by map radius to your real daily geography, a review-score floor, free-cancellation when plans are soft, and guest type if travelling with family. Then sort by price. Skipping straight to sort-by-price creates noise and decision fatigue.

Review-score floors around 8.0–8.5 (on 10-point OTA scales) cut most disasters without forcing luxury budgets. Below that, read recent negatives about damp, noise and safety. Brand new hotels with few reviews are fine if you accept variance. Scales differ slightly by site.

Property type filters remove accidental hostels or party hotels when you need sleep. Star ratings are inconsistent across countries — treat them as loose hints. Guest photos from the last three months beat professional galleries.

Free-cancellation filters are mandatory until flights are ticketed. Once flights are firm, you can consider non-refundable for real savings. Metas that bury cancellation status until click-through deserve slower handling — open the merchant early.

Trivago is enough as a single radar for most trips as long as you still dual-quote merchants afterwards. Kayak or Google Hotels adds confirmation when the first result looks odd. Diminishing returns hit hard after two radars; a third mostly burns evening time, and losing Hotellook has not changed that arithmetic.

Business trips need desk/workspace mentions and reliable Wi‑Fi comments more than spa photos. Family trips need lift access and breakfast hours. Match filters to the job of the stay, not to aspirational holiday imagery when you are there to sleep between meetings.

  • Map radius before price sort
  • Review floor + recent guest photos
  • Cancellable until flights firm
  • One radar, two at the most
  • Filter for the job of the stay

Hotel metasearch — FAQs

Link to this answer

Radars find offers; merchants ticket rooms. Dual-quote and read the cancellation text before you pay. Booking.com and Agoda links here are TravelShifu partner links, disclosed above. Trivago, Kayak and Google Hotels are editorial. Hotellook is closed, so there is nothing left to click.

  • Is the meta price guaranteed? — No; confirm on the merchant checkout.
  • Why did the price rise after click? — Currency, login, room type drift or stale cache — compare carefully.
  • Should I book the top sponsored hotel? — Not automatically; sort and read reviews.
  • Is Kayak better because of flights? — Only if you use that stack; hotel radars are still worth dual-checking.
  • Is Hotellook coming back? — Nothing suggests it: no successor site, no redirect, no statement.
  • Does Trivago replace Booking.com? — No; it is a radar, and it sends you to Booking.com or another OTA.
  • Are taxes included? — Look at the total at merchant checkout, not only the tile.
  • Mobile app rates differ? — Sometimes; check if you care about every pound.
  • Are links affiliate? — Booking.com and Agoda are TravelShifu partners here; the radars are not.

Evidence note

How we checked this guide

Research basis

Structured desk research using the comparison criteria and limitations stated in this guide.

Experience standard

No first-hand test or trip is implied unless the article explicitly states who tested it, when and under what conditions.

Content update date

Content updated on 6 August 2026; this is not an independent verification of every linked source. Time-sensitive prices, rules and eligibility must be checked again before purchase or travel.

Commercial independence

Commercial links are labelled before the click. Their presence is not evidence of personal testing, programme approval or guaranteed availability.

See the editorial policy, method notes, the scoped evidence ledger, or report a correction.